 |
| Home > product quality and comparison > General
quality comparison |
 |
 |
|
|
 Self-Brake
Reducer VS Worm Reducer General quality comparison |
|
|
|
Section
|
Self-Brake
Reducer
|
Worm
Reducer
|
|
Power
translation
method
|
gear
drive
|
worm
drive
|
|
Motion
method
|
rolling
motion
|
Sliding
motion
|
|
Frictional
heat
|
low
heat
|
high
heat
|
|
Input-output
axis direction
|
concentricity
axis or parallel axis method
|
axis
perpendicular method
|
|
Reducer
size
|
irrelevant
with rate of reduction
|
proportionate
with a rate of reduction
|
|
Reverse
propulsion prevention function
|
All
deceleration scope possibility
|
High
lead angle possibility
|
|
Life
Cycle
|
semipermanent
|
periodic
worm gear exchange
|
|
Gear
quality of material
|
STEEL
|
compound
metal
|
|
Intensity
|
hyper
high-intensity
|
High-intensity
|
|
noise
& Vibration
|
low
noise & Vibration
|
low
noise & Vibration
|
|
|
|
|
The
number of teeth where gather in upon gear |
|
|
|
Self-Brake
Reducer
|
Worm
Reducer
|
|
number
of working teeth : 12 over
|
the
number number of working teeth:
3~5 unit
|
|
A
picture additional plan
|
A
picture additional plan
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison
high position |
|
|
|
Comparison
item
|
Self-Brake
Reducer
|
Worm
Self-lock Reducer
|
|
Reducer
capacity
|
0.42
|
1
|
|
Reducer
weight
|
0.67
|
1
|
|
the
number of working teeth
|
12
over
|
3~5
quantity
|
|
efficiency
of power translation
|
92%
over
|
45~55%
|
|
Braking
efficiency
|
100%
|
when
worm wheel was worn ,
it's
braking is impossible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
